Panel Discussion on the US Supreme Court Kiobel Case by Distinguished Litigators and Scholars
Presented by the Federalist Society International Law and National Security Practice Group and the Orange County Lawyers Chapter
The
US Supreme Court has asked for expanded briefs and reargument in the Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum
case. At issue is the right to sue in U.S. courts for human rights
abuses — including torture — carried out in other countries under the
1789 Alien Tort Statute (28 U.S.C. § 1350). This case has implications for corporations, including multi-national firms,
as well as for political organizations, that are accused of violating
the rights of individuals under international or U.S. law. Also,
potentially at issue is whether a party that is being sued can be challenged not
for directly engaging in human rights abuses, but for “aiding and abetting” someone else who did so.
When: Thursday, June 21, 11:30 a.m. (registration), 11:45 am (lunch). The discussion will start promptly at 11:45am and continue to 1:15pm to cover discussion and Q and A.
Where: Second Floor Knobbe Conference Center, 2040 Main Street, Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 760-0404
Parking: Please park in the parking structure near the 2040 building and bring your ticket to lunch for validation. Click here for directions.
Parking: Please park in the parking structure near the 2040 building and bring your ticket to lunch for validation. Click here for directions.
Cost: $35 for lunch and 1 hour of MCLE credit. (The Federalist Society is a California State Bar approved provider of MCLE)
RSVP and Pay: To RSVP and pay by credit card, click the Buy Now button on the right. To pay by cash or check at the door, please send the RSVP to Joseph W. Haney III at jhaney@haney-law.com. Make checks payable to “The Federalist Society”.
Panelists:
Anton Metlitsky is counsel in
O’Melveny’s New York office and a member of the Appellate Practice. He
works on appellate and complex litigation matters. Anton has drafted
trial and appellate briefs, both civil and criminal,
on subjects including federal constitutional law, federal criminal law,
federal jurisdiction and procedure, administrative law, international
and foreign affairs law, antitrust, trademark, and federal
preemption. Anton has also presented oral argument in the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Anton was a law clerk to the Honorable John G. Roberts Jr., US Supreme Court and Honorable Merrick Garland, US Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit and is admitted to practice in the US Court of Appeals, Second, Seventh, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits.
Publications: “Indirect Purchaser Standing In Federal Court: Take 2” (co-authors Ken O'Rourke and Mark Davies), Law360 (October 12, 2009); Note, “How Clear is Clear in Chevron’s Step One?” 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1687 (2005)
Litigated: Sarei et al v. Rio Tinto Plc et al (defended Rio Tinto) and Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobile Corporation
Publications: “Indirect Purchaser Standing In Federal Court: Take 2” (co-authors Ken O'Rourke and Mark Davies), Law360 (October 12, 2009); Note, “How Clear is Clear in Chevron’s Step One?” 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1687 (2005)
Litigated: Sarei et al v. Rio Tinto Plc et al (defended Rio Tinto) and Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobile Corporation
Publications: "No Longer Little Known But Now a Door Ajar:
An Overview of the Evolving and Dangerous Role of the Alien Tort
Statute in Human Rights and International Law Jurisprudence", "Constitutional Structure as a Limitation on the Scope of the Law of Nations in the Alien Tort Claims Act", and "Legal Mechanization of Corporate Social Responsibility Through Alien Tort Statute Litigation"
Michael J. Bazyler is Professor
of Law and The "1939" Club Law Scholar in Holocaust and Human Rights
Studies at Chapman University School of Law in Orange, California. He is
also a research fellow
at the Holocaust Education Trust in London; and the holder of previous
fellowships at Harvard Law School and the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. In Fall 2006, he was a Research
Fellow at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem (The Holocaust Martyrs’
and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority of Israel) and the holder of the Baron Friedrich Carl von Oppenheim Chair for the Study of Racism, Antisemitism and the Holocaust. Bazyler is the author of over a dozen law review articles on
subjects covering public international law, international human rights
law, international trade law and comparative law. His work has been
published in such journals
as The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Kansas Law Review,
Arizona Law Review, Northwestern Law Review, University of Richmond Law
Review, Stanford Journal of International Law, Berkeley Journal of
International Law, Columbia Journal of Transnational
Law, and Fordham Journal of International Law. After twenty-five years of teaching at
Whittier Law School, Bazyler joined the Chapman law faculty in Fall,
2008. Over his 27-year law teaching career, Bazyler has been a visiting
professor,
including a distinguished visiting professor, at various law schools in
the United States, Australia, Russia, Belarus, and Israel. He teaches
Comparative Law, Public International Law, International Human Rights
Law, International Business Litigation, International
Business Transactions, Criminal Law, Torts, Civil Procedure and a
course he created entitled The Holocaust, Genocide and the Law.
Publication in Law.com: "Hold corporations accountable" - Nuremberg-era jurisprudence offers a compelling precedent for imposing
sanctions on companies for human rights violations, as in the 'Kiobel'
case before the high court.
Moderator:
Professor Michael D. Ramsey teaches and writes in the areas of Constitutional Law, Foreign Relations Law and International Business Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs (Harvard Univ. Press, 2007) and of numerous articles in leading scholarly journals, including "Textualism and War Powers" (Chicago Law Review, 2002) and "The Executive Power over Foreign Affairs" (with Professor Saikrishna Prakash) (Yale Law Journal, 2001). Ramsey received the 1998 Thorsnes Prize for excellence in teaching, and the 2002 and 2007 Thorsnes Prizes for outstanding scholarship. He has taught as a visiting professor for the University of California, San Diego, Department of Political Science and for the University of Paris-Sorbonne, Department of Comparative Law. Before joining the USD faculty in 1995, he served as a law clerk to Judge J. Clifford Wallace of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court, and practiced international business law with the firm of Latham & Watkins. Ramsey is a summa cum laude graduate of Stanford Law School, where he served as senior articles editor of the Stanford Journal of International Law.
Moderator:
Professor Michael D. Ramsey teaches and writes in the areas of Constitutional Law, Foreign Relations Law and International Business Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs (Harvard Univ. Press, 2007) and of numerous articles in leading scholarly journals, including "Textualism and War Powers" (Chicago Law Review, 2002) and "The Executive Power over Foreign Affairs" (with Professor Saikrishna Prakash) (Yale Law Journal, 2001). Ramsey received the 1998 Thorsnes Prize for excellence in teaching, and the 2002 and 2007 Thorsnes Prizes for outstanding scholarship. He has taught as a visiting professor for the University of California, San Diego, Department of Political Science and for the University of Paris-Sorbonne, Department of Comparative Law. Before joining the USD faculty in 1995, he served as a law clerk to Judge J. Clifford Wallace of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court, and practiced international business law with the firm of Latham & Watkins. Ramsey is a summa cum laude graduate of Stanford Law School, where he served as senior articles editor of the Stanford Journal of International Law.
2 comments:
very good post for orange county lawyers chapter of the federalist society.
Personal Injury Attorney Dallas
Potentially at issue is whether a party that is being sued can be challenged not for directly engaging in human rights abuses. Best Lawyers
Post a Comment